Heron Consulting / ClientEnablement.com

PersistIQ Audit Report | March 25, 2026
Account: thomas.hager@heronconsulting.se | Campaign: C1#Services

Executive Summary

5/10
Overall Score
0%
Reply Rate
51%
Open Rate
22d
Domain Age
Critical Issue: Zero Replies
439 leads contacted with 0 replies. This is not normal - even mediocre campaigns see 1-5% reply rates. The problem is upstream of copy quality.

Cold Email Viability: MODERATE

The PowerPoint add-in product is real and solves a genuine pain point. The market is reachable. However, execution has critical issues blocking all replies.

Account Health: RED

The disconnect between sender identity (Heron Consulting = management consulting) and product offering (PowerPoint software from clientenablement.com) is confusing prospects. Additionally, the sending domain is only 22 days old.

Priority Actions

Campaign Metrics

674
Total Leads
439
Contacted
0
Replies
222
Opens
12
Bounces
6
Steps
What's Working
Open rate (50.6%) suggests deliverability is functional
Bounce rate (2.7%) indicates acceptable list quality
5 mailboxes configured with appropriate daily limits
Product has clear value proposition

Deliverability Analysis

Domain Age SPF DKIM DMARC
clientenablement.com 22 days Valid Valid Valid
heronconsulting.se 61 days Not checked Not checked Not checked
Domain Age Warning
clientenablement.com is only 22 days old. Domains under 60 days often see deliverability challenges. Continue conservative volume (25/day per mailbox) and expect gradual improvement as the domain ages.

Critical Issues

1. Product/Identity Mismatch
Website: Operations Strategy & Supply Chain consulting
Emails: PowerPoint automation add-in

Prospects checking the website see no mention of PowerPoint tools. Fix: Create a dedicated product page explaining the connection, or consolidate branding.
2. Over-Syndicated Spintax
Every sentence has 3+ variations. Example: "{{ RANDOM | random: 'Hey','Hi','Hello' }} {{ first_name }}" - this feels assembled, not written. Prospects sense templated randomness.
3. No Productized Deliverable Name
"PowerPoint add-in" is generic. Give it a name: SlideSync, DeckFlow, RefManager - anything that gives it identity and makes it memorable.
4. Repetitive CTAs
Every single step asks "want a demo?" Variation needed: demo offer, referral ask, direct trial, social proof, breakup.

Copy Teardown - Step 1 Rewrite

Current Problem: Heavy spintax, generic pain points, no credibility anchor

Subject: Deck reference checks at {{ company_name }}

{{ first_name }},

Quick question about how {{ company_name }} handles reference management in client-facing decks.

Most firms we talk to still verify slide footnotes manually. When leadership changes a number at 6pm, someone stays until midnight updating references across 80+ slides.

We built a PowerPoint add-in that eliminates that work. Footnotes track with content, slide numbers auto-update, and decks stay clean no matter how many revisions.

One consulting team cut 250+ manual reference checks per deck to zero.

Worth a 3-minute demo, or should I send a quick walkthrough video first?

Best,
Aria

P.S. Built on Microsoft tech, no data leaves your environment.

Why this works:

Recommended Sequence Structure

Step Angle CTA Type Timing
1 Pain/problem awareness Demo or video offer Immediate
2 Referral path "Who owns this?" 2 days
3 Direct trial Try on next deck 3 days
4 Peer social proof Worth a look? 2 days
5 Honest breakup Permission to close 3 days

Recommendation: Remove Step 6. Six steps for a PowerPoint add-in is excessive - diminishing returns after Step 4.

Strategic Recommendations

1. Clarify Brand Architecture

The disconnect between heronconsulting.se and clientenablement.com is confusing prospects. Options:

2. Productize the Deliverable

"PowerPoint add-in" is generic. Give it a name: SlideSync, RefFlow, DeckTrack, CiteManager - anything that gives it identity.

3. Build One Case Study

A single detailed case study with company type, before/after workflow, hours saved, and actual user quote would dramatically improve credibility.

4. Narrow the ICP

Focus on one vertical first (e.g., consulting firms 500-2000 employees) to build case studies before expanding.

5. Patience on Domain Age

clientenablement.com is 22 days old. Continue current volume and expect gradual improvement after 60-90 days.

Scorecard Summary

Category Score Notes
Deliverability 6/10 New domain (22 days), properly configured
Copy Quality 4/10 Over-spintaxed, needs rewrite
Targeting 5/10 Unclear vertical focus
Offer Clarity 4/10 Product/identity mismatch
Sequence Structure 6/10 Good length, repetitive CTAs
Overall 5/10 Fixable, needs strategic clarity

Full detailed audit saved to: heron-consulting-audit-2026-03-25.txt

Generated March 25, 2026